201. The optimal night-time home blood pressure monitoring schedule: agreement with ambulatory blood pressure and association with organ damage.
Kollias A, Andreadis E, Agaliotis G, Kolyvas GN, Achimastos A, Stergiou GS.
|
202. Pharmacy blood pressure: a common, useful, and neglected out of office blood pressure measurement method.
Stergiou GS, Kyriakoulis KG, Kollias A.
|
203. Differential associations of systolic and diastolic time rate of blood pressure variation with carotid atherosclerosis and plaque echogenicity.
Kolyviras A, Manios E, Georgiopoulos G, Michas F, Gustavsson T, Papadopoulou E, Ageliki L, Kanakakis J, Papamichael C, Stergiou G, Zakopoulos N, Stamatelopoulos K.
+ Εμφάνιση Περίληψης
In the current study, the authors sought to assess whether the time rate of systolic and diastolic blood pressure variation is associated with advanced subclinical stages of carotid atherosclerosis and plaque echogenicity assessed by gray scale median. The authors recruited 237 consecutive patients with normotension and hypertension who underwent 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and carotid artery ultrasonography. There was an independent association between low 24-hour systolic time rate and increased echogenicity of carotid plaques (adjusted odds ratio for highest vs lower tertiles of gray scale median, 0.470; 95% confidence interval, 0.245-0.902 [P = .023]). Moreover, increased nighttime diastolic time rate independently correlated with the presence (adjusted odds ratio, 1.328; P = .015) and number of carotid plaques (adjusted odds ratio, 1.410; P = .003). These results indicate differential associations of the systolic and diastolic components of time rate of blood pressure variation with the presence, extent, and composition of carotid plaques and suggest that when blood pressure variation is assessed, both components should be considered.
|
204. Prognostic value of average home blood pressure and variability: 19-year follow-up of the Didima study.
Ntineri A, Kalogeropoulos PG, Kyriakoulis KG, Aissopou EK, Thomopoulou G, Kollias A, Stergiou GS.
|
205. Visit-to-Visit Office Blood Pressure Variability and Cardiovascular Outcomes in SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial).
Chang TI, Reboussin DM, Chertow GM, Cheung AK, Cushman WC, Kostis WJ, Parati G, Raj D, Riessen E, Shapiro B, Stergiou GS, Townsend RR, Tsioufis K, Whelton PK, Whittle J, Wright JT, Papademetriou V.
|
206. Evidence on Blood Pressure Measurement Methodology and Clinical Implementation: Research Agenda for the 21st Century.
Stergiou GS, Kollias A, Protogerou AD.
|
207. Defining Ambulatory Blood Pressure Thresholds for Decision Making in Hypertension: The Effect of Race and Methodology.
Stergiou GS, Ntineri A, Kollias A.
|
208. Accuracy of Automated Blood Pressure Measurement in Children: Evidence, Issues, and Perspectives.
Stergiou GS, Boubouchairopoulou N, Kollias A.
|
209. The pursuit of accurate blood pressure measurement: A 35-year travail.
O'Brien E, Stergiou GS.
|
210. Recommended standards for assessing blood pressure in human research where blood pressure or hypertension is a major focus.
|
211. Associations between obesity, adverse behavioral patterns and cardiovascular risk factors among adolescent inhabitants of a Greek island.
Garoufi A, Grammatikos EE, Kollias A, Grammatikos E, Stergiou GS, Soldatou A.
|
212. Evidence on the accuracy of automated blood pressure monitors in children: quantity versus quality.
Stergiou GS, Kollias A, Boubouchairopoulou N, Ntineri A, O'Brien E.
|
213. Antihypertensive treatment-induced changes in arterial stiffness: Which artery? Which method?
Kollias A, Protogerou AD, Stergiou GS.
|
214. The Changing Landscape for Stroke Prevention in AF: Findings From the GLORIA-AF Registry Phase 2.
Huisman MV, Rothman KJ, Paquette M, Teutsch C, Diener HC, Dubner SJ, Halperin JL, Ma CS, Zint K, Elsaesser A, Bartels DB, Lip GY.
|
215. Outcome-Driven Thresholds for Increased Home Blood Pressure Variability.
Juhanoja EP, Niiranen TJ, Johansson JK, Puukka PJ, Thijs L, Asayama K, Langén VL, Hozawa A, Aparicio LS, Ohkubo T, Tsuji I, Imai Y, Stergiou GS, Jula AM, Staessen JA.
+ Εμφάνιση Περίληψης
Increased blood pressure (BP) variability predicts cardiovascular disease, but lack of operational thresholds limits its use in clinical practice. Our aim was to define outcome-driven thresholds for increased day-to-day home BP variability. We studied a population-based sample of 6238 individuals (mean age 60.0±12.9, 56.4% women) from Japan, Greece, and Finland. All participants self-measured their home BP on ≥3 days. We defined home BP variability as the coefficient of variation of the first morning BPs on 3 to 7 days. We assessed the association between systolic/diastolic BP variability (as a continuous variable and in deciles of coefficient of variation) and cardiovascular outcomes using Cox regression models adjusted for cohort and classical cardiovascular risk factors, including BP. During a follow-up of 9.3±3.6 years, 304 cardiovascular deaths and 715 cardiovascular events occurred. A 1 SD increase in systolic/diastolic home BP variability was associated with increased risk of cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio, 1.17/1.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-1.30/1.11-1.34;
|
216. Validation of non-invasive central blood pressure devices: ARTERY Society task force consensus statement on protocol standardization.
Sharman JE, Avolio AP, Baulmann J, Benetos A, Blacher J, Blizzard CL, Boutouyrie P, Chen CH, Chowienczyk P, Cockcroft JR, Cruickshank JK, Ferreira I, Ghiadoni L, Hughes A, Jankowski P, Laurent S, McDonnell BJ, McEniery C, Millasseau SC, Papaioannou TG, Parati G, Park JB, Protogerou AD, Roman MJ, Schillaci G, Segers P, Stergiou GS, Tomiyama H, Townsend RR, Van Bortel LM, Wang J, Wassertheurer S, Weber T, Wilkinson IB, Vlachopoulos C.
|
217. A novel cuffless device for self-measurement of blood pressure: concept, performance and clinical validation.
Boubouchairopoulou N, Kollias A, Chiu B, Chen B, Lagou S, Anestis P, Stergiou GS.
+ Εμφάνιση Περίληψης
A pocket-size cuffless electronic device for self-measurement of blood pressure (BP) has been developed (Freescan, Maisense Inc., Zhubei, Taiwan). The device estimates BP within 10 s using three embedded electrodes and one force sensor that is applied over the radial pulse to evaluate the pulse wave. Before use, basic anthropometric characteristics are recorded on the device, and individualized initial calibration is required based on a standard BP measurement performed using an upper-arm BP monitor. The device performance in providing valid BP readings was evaluated in 313 normotensive and hypertensive adults in three study phases during which the device sensor was upgraded. A formal validation study of a prototype device against mercury sphygmomanometer was performed according to the American National Standards Institute/Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/International Organization for Standardization (ANSI/AAMI/ISO) 2013 protocol. The test device succeeded in obtaining a valid BP measurement (three successful readings within up to five attempts) in 55-72% of the participants, which reached 87% with device sensor upgrade. For the validation study, 125 adults were recruited and 85 met the protocol requirements for inclusion. The mean device-observers BP difference was 3.2±6.7 (s.d.) mm Hg for systolic and 2.6±4.6 mm Hg for diastolic BP (criterion 1). The estimated s.d. (inter-subject variability) were 5.83 and 4.17 mm Hg respectively (criterion 2). These data suggest that this prototype cuffless BP monitor provides valid self-measurements in the vast majority of adults, and satisfies the BP measurement accuracy criteria of the ANSI/AAMI/ISO 2013 validation protocol.
|
218. Association of night-time home blood pressure with night-time ambulatory blood pressure and target-organ damage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kollias A, Ntineri A, Stergiou GS.
|
219. Worldwide trends in blood pressure from 1975 to 2015: a pooled analysis of 1479 population-based measurement studies with 19·1 million participants.
|
220. Management of Masked Hypertension: Why Are We Still Sitting on the Fence?
Stergiou GS, Ntineri A, Kollias A.
|